AfterWorld Survival Forum

Discussions => Knowledge Database => Topic started by: Event "Janе" Horizon on February 05, 2013, 04:56:28 am

Title: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Event "Janе" Horizon on February 05, 2013, 04:56:28 am
The following maps show players where the each category of stone are located and the relative ratio

Grid Reference Map
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NU_Map_Grid_zps97059391.png)



Note: the stones to west of town actually extend to 89o West.

Note: there is 8 times more stone in the east stone collections, at stone density of 6.5 more than that of the west collections.



Coal
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Coal_zps6f376dee.png)


Copper
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Copper_zps98779fd9.png)


Iron
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Iron_zps4281f3c1.png)


Lead
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Lead_zps03ee766a.png)


Nitre
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Nitre_zps9a232185.png)


Pharr
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Pharr_zpsa26073d5.png)


Sulfur
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Sulfur_zpsc9b22de7.png)


Utium
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Utium_zps887eeee4.png)


Wygg
(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx230/janesavon/NU%20Stone%20Locations/NewUrengoy_Wygg_zps0c99cf10.png)
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Zaelkaer "Allfather" Vampyre on February 05, 2013, 05:46:31 am
Most Excellent. Great collaboration of a few players. An absolute sticky for adamant rock pickers.

The Allfather
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Sifalio "Sifis" Kritikakis on February 05, 2013, 06:06:26 am
AMAZING !!!!!!!!

+rep

TY for sharing all this info! The newcomers will be very happy!!!
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Bold "Bertram" Blanshard on February 05, 2013, 07:01:11 am
The best location for all stones except Sulfur is in the East, so I think to rank by relative ratio gives the wrong information. That is because the stone density there is much greater, one can pick to at least 150% of weight before needing to use Ctrl-d. A clone costs about 80 Kg, so getting an extra 500Kg above weight is a huge advantage, even for citizens. This factor has changed from Alpha, where it was not so easy to get massively overweight; but then it wasn't necessary there, the zones were much closer to the town.

Sorry, but I think the implied advice to pick any stone except Sulfur in the West is plain wrong.

Brina's zone locations are somewhat inaccurate too, though I expect pickers will soon find their favourite routes to the densest areas.

I'm picking in a cycle of 3, to NE, to SE, and to the 2 zones in the W. this gives me approximately an even weight of each stone to give to the warrant officers.
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: dale "dalewj" ofj on February 05, 2013, 12:18:27 pm
fanatastic.  Maybe this should be stickied inthe newcomers section?
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Paul "Cuey" Darkmane on February 05, 2013, 05:31:01 pm
the ores nitre/coal/utium and wygg to the north east is off by a while the field you have put doesnt extend north east enough there is around 50% more to extend to the north east of the original size you have put on ... and the iron/copper/lead and pharr field extends way too far to the south west if it was reduced by about 50% also (from the south west part) then it would be more accurate ... gl
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Event "Janе" Horizon on February 06, 2013, 07:41:44 am
Added NU Grid Reference Map
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Jarod "Brickwit" McBrickerton on February 08, 2013, 06:05:39 pm
The first image is no longer available.
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Event "Janе" Horizon on February 08, 2013, 10:20:58 pm
The first image is no longer available.
Thanks! Fixed.
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Event "Janе" Horizon on February 10, 2013, 04:50:57 am
the ores nitre/coal/utium and wygg to the north east is off by a while the field you have put doesnt extend north east enough there is around 50% more to extend to the north east of the original size you have put on ... and the iron/copper/lead and pharr field extends way too far to the south west if it was reduced by about 50% also (from the south west part) then it would be more accurate ... gl
Thanks - I have put a note in the first post regarding the stone collections to west of  town.
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Event "Janе" Horizon on February 10, 2013, 05:21:04 am
Note: there is 8 times more stone in the east stone collections, at stone density of 6.5 more than that of the west collections.
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Jarod "Brickwit" McBrickerton on February 10, 2013, 07:27:58 pm
If the overall stone density is 6.5 times higher, how is the overall stone availability 8 times higher? Do the rocks in the east also provide more stone on average than in the west or are you comparing overall stone coverage (i.e. colored map area) in the east with that in the west?
Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: Event "Janе" Horizon on February 10, 2013, 11:30:23 pm
If the overall stone density is 6.5 times higher, how is the overall stone availability 8 times higher? Do the rocks in the east also provide more stone on average than in the west or are you comparing overall stone coverage (i.e. colored map area) in the east with that in the west?
There are 8 times more rocks in the east compared to the west.
On average - the east rocks are 6.5 times closer to one another than the rocks to the west.

Title: Re: New Urengoy: Stones by location
Post by: dale "dalewj" ofj on February 11, 2013, 01:24:57 am

There are 8 times more rocks in the east compared to the west.
On average - the east rocks are 6.5 times closer to one another than the rocks to the west.
Im sorry da Event i found the ratio to be 6.49 :)